Breast Reconstruction

The SIEA flap rebuilds the breast from lower abdominal tissue without cutting any abdominal muscle or fascia, the least invasive abdominal option. Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin microsurgeon, explains what the SIEA flap is, how it compares to the DIEP and to thigh-based PAP flaps, why it is only feasible in a minority of patients, what delay procedures can and cannot do, and who is a candidate. Includes monitoring, recovery, and honest limitations.

BRCA1, BRCA2, and other high-risk genes change how breast reconstruction is planned. Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin reconstructive surgeon, explains how reconstruction differs for genetic-risk patients, the choice between prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy, nipple-sparing options and the small residual risk in the preserved nipple, implant versus autologous reconstruction, coordination with other risk-reducing surgery, and lifelong monitoring. Written for patients carrying a hereditary cancer mutation who are weighing risk-reducing surgery and reconstruction.

Should breast reconstruction happen at the time of mastectomy? What happens if it shouldn't or can't? Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin reconstructive surgeon, explains immediate vs. delayed timing — when immediate reconstruction is ideal, the specific reasons delayed makes sense, and how the staged tissue-expander pathway differs from both. Covers implant and autologous options at each timing, the critical role of radiation, and the reassuring finding that both paths reach equivalent long-term satisfaction.

Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction places the implant above the chest muscle rather than beneath it, eliminating animation deformity and reducing postoperative pain. Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin reconstructive surgeon, explains the technique, why he uses acellular dermal matrix, how direct-to-implant and staged approaches differ, how radiation factors in, and when sub-pectoral placement still serves patients better — including those without access to fat grafting.

Struggling with chronic chest or arm pain after breast cancer? Austin-based peripheral nerve specialist and breast reconstruction surgeon Dr. Brian P. Kelley explains how post-mastectomy neuromas and radiation neuritis—not your breast reconstruction — may be the true cause. We discuss evidence-based treatments and options for advanced nerve surgeries like TMR and RPNI. Learn how targeted nerve surgery might provide meaningful pain relief while potentially preserving your breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction is protected by federal law, but real coverage gaps remain. Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin reconstructive microsurgeon, walks through WHCRA, Texas Medicaid (MBCC), Travis County MAP, and the Seton charity care he participates in for patients without standard coverage. The post also covers the Breast Cancer Resource Center, the coverage gray zone for sensate reconstruction and prophylactic lymphedema surgery, and how to appeal when these procedures are denied.

A painful neuroma after surgery is a focal, treatable cause of chronic post-surgical pain that is often missed. Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin nerve surgeon, walks through where neuromas form after specific operations — mastectomy and cancer resection, hernia repair, knee and joint surgery, and facial surgery — and what modern treatment looks like, including traditional excision and modern techniques like TMR and RPNI. PRO data and specialist evaluation criteria included.

Capsular contracture is the most common complication of implant-based breast reconstruction over time. Dr. Brian Kelley, an Austin reconstructive surgeon, walks through what causes it, when conservative measures help, when surgery is needed, why radiation matters so much, and the three real conversion options — new implants with capsulectomy, conversion to autologous flap reconstruction, or aesthetic flat closure. Patient-reported outcomes data, recovery timelines, and Baker grading included.

The DIEP flap is the most common autologous breast reconstruction, but not every patient is a candidate — some are too thin, have had prior abdominal surgery, or prefer a different donor site. Dr. Brian Kelley, a microsurgeon in Austin, walks through the alternatives: PAP, TUG, SGAP and other free flaps; the latissimus dorsi flap; and his work offering autologous reconstruction to charity-care and Travis County MAPs patients who otherwise wouldn't have access.

A board-certified Austin plastic surgeon on what Motiva and other breast implants actually mean for reconstruction — and why augmentation data doesn't necessarily transfer to a post-mastectomy breast.

If radiation is part of your breast cancer treatment, the reconstruction decision becomes a question of durability. The published evidence consistently favors autologous (your own tissue) reconstruction over implants in radiated tissue — both in complication rates and in long-term patient-reported satisfaction. Dr. Brian Kelley, a microsurgeon in Austin and co-author of several studies on radiation and breast reconstruction, explains the evidence, the options, and how to choose a durable result for the long term.

Many patients who had a breast reconstruction in the past are unhappy with the result or developed a complication and assume they are stuck with it. Usually they are not. Dr. Brian Kelley, a reconstructive microsurgeon in Austin, explains the realistic options for revising a prior reconstruction — cosmetic refinement, converting implants to your own tissue, improving or salvaging a prior flap with other donor sites, or converting to aesthetic flat closure — and what the outcomes data show.

Sex and intimacy after breast reconstruction is one of the most important parts of recovery and the least honestly discussed. Up to 85% of breast cancer patients report sexual health concerns, yet few receive guidance. Dr. Brian Kelley explains what actually changes — sensation loss, body image, the effects of cancer treatment — what surgery can and cannot restore, what the patient-reported outcomes data show, and where to find real help. An honest, evidence-based conversation.

Not every patient who has a mastectomy wants reconstruction, and choosing to go flat is a valid, increasingly common decision. Aesthetic flat closure is doing that choice well — intentionally contouring the chest for a smooth, flat result. Dr. Brian Kelley explains the techniques, recovery, and outcomes, why most patients don't need a plastic surgeon for it, and the role a plastic surgeon plays in refinement, in converting a reconstruction to flat, and in delayed reconstruction later.

Choosing between implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction comes down to a few key questions: whether you need radiation, whether you have adequate donor tissue, and how you weigh a shorter recovery against a more durable result. Dr. Brian Kelley lays out a six-question framework and reviews the patient-reported outcomes data — including large multicenter studies showing autologous reconstruction tends to produce higher long-term satisfaction — alongside the recovery timelines, risks, and complication rates for each pathway.

Hybrid breast reconstruction combines an autologous flap, typically DIEP, with a breast implant placed behind the flap. The technique is offered to patients who want flap-based reconstruction but have limited donor tissue, who want a larger reconstruction than the flap alone could provide, or who have a thin chest wall after radiation. The implant sits in a healthier biological environment than in standard implant reconstruction, with a long-term risk profile closer to cosmetic augmentation.

Dr Brian Kelley outlines the realistic, staged recovery timeline for DIEP flap breast reconstruction. It details expectations from the initial hospital stay and flap monitoring through early home recovery, highlighting drain care, activity restrictions, and potential warning signs. The text explains the gradual return to function, work, exercise, and intimacy over subsequent months. Emphasizing that recovery involves physical, psychological, and social dimensions, the guide addresses long-term considerations, physical therapy, and the timing of refinement procedures to assist patients in preparing for a multidimensional, year-long healing process.

Autologous fat grafting uses the patient's own fat — harvested through low-pressure liposuction, processed, and injected in small aliquots — to refine reconstructive results. The technique is most useful in breast reconstruction for softening implant contour irregularities and post-radiation tissue, in Mohs and oncologic reconstruction for residual contour deficits, and in trauma and burn reconstruction for scar release and volume restoration. Outcomes are favorable in selected patients but require staged sessions because not all injected fat survives. Dr. Brian Kelley, board-certified plastic surgeon in Austin, explains the established reconstructive uses, realistic outcomes, and risks.

Classic operations like TRAM flap helped bring about autologous breast reconstruction, but modern techniques like the DIEP or PAP flap allow for less donor site morbidity. Dr Kelley explores these benefits.

Breast sensation after mastectomy is typically reduced or absent, and a subset of patients develop chronic post-mastectomy pain. Nerve grafting, allograft, and innervated flap techniques can improve sensation in some patients, but normal pre-mastectomy sensation is essentially never restored. Dr Brian Kelley helps to summarize and explain the latest science.

Lymphedema is a dreaded long-term affect of lymph node dissection in cancer surgery, such as breast cancer. Modern surgical techniques may help to prevent or alleviate those symptoms but surgeons aren't sure what the full utility of these treatments may be. We explore the background and offer our thoughts on when these surgeries might be right for patients.

An overview of the history, latest trends, and controversies shaping breast implants and breast reconstruction. Breast Implants and Implant-Based Reconstruction in Austin, TX

A surgeon's perspectives on DIEP flap breast reconstruction and a patient's journey to healing.